- Author
giraffacus wrote:kafkaesque wrote:giraffacus wrote:kafkaesque wrote:if anyone's curious, the review has 31 sentences, and just 10 of them are addressing the music. that's less than a third. pretty offensive to these guys who obviously put a lot of work into this thing
it's almost like sometimes music isn't just a series of randomly generated sounds that exist in a vacuum.
it's almost like a review of a collection of songs should at least spend the majority of its time talking about the songs
not if the more important of aspect of the album isn't just the songs but where it places the band in the context of their output and the larger scheme of what's happening in music.
it is my firm view that the most important aspect of an album is the album itself. you may disagree, but i think the songs matter most
the songs are part of a larger whole though. why make an album at all then? why write about certain things? in 2016 you can't just get on your laptop and type out "i don't like the use of major chords" or "the beats are good". everyone complained when they used a dumb burrito metaphor anyways. you can't write about this album without acknowledging the ones that came before it to talk about why it's disappointing, you can't write about Tusk without talking about Rumors, or Sign O' The Times without Purple Rain.
exactly this
It really sucks that because of this p4k review, we can't even discuss what we as a community think about this album. Instead we are discussing the validity of opinions of rushed reviewers trying to meet a deadline/working for larger publications that are always going to be pushing specific ideas/trends/etc.
Not that there haven't been well though out posts that express why they like or dislike the album, just saying there should be more of that.
I understand that what is happening around the music as it is released is interesting, and relevant to the general idea of discussing the album, but if anything, that stuff is more interesting to discuss when looking back on the album as opposed to when it first comes out and we are all still digesting it.
Aw come on, music discussion is a weird messy thing and if you dont try and articulate differing opinions it's just high fives and ass pats. it's always up for debate and discussion, and pitchfork being who they are incites that debate.