Page 260 of 343

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 7:12 am
by iKahn
Hah! This quote here is awesome:
wrote:
But for all its booming breaks and future-shocked freneticism, Grim Reaper—like all Panda Bear records—remains a highly insular experience, one where it often sounds as if Lennox is speaking into a mirror. "So good, you’ve got it so good," he sings overtop the blissed-out shuffle of "Crosswords"—a simple statement of fact from a happily married father of two who lives in a cosmopolitan coastal European city in between sold-out tours.

Some kind of a mild jab lol.

Fuckn Berman



Really though, that was a pretty solid review. idgaf bout no 1-10 ratings, but the read is fun. Congrats Noah and Pete on this whole ordeal. Loved watching all of this unfold and it's great to see huge recognition for this beautiful piece of work.

my lp has not arrived yet, but Im sure tomorrow

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 7:18 am
by iKahn
And hey are they just not going to review Mr. Noah EP? Don't they usually do that kind of shit? When they didn't do it back it November I figured they'd do them both at release.


HMMM

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 7:38 am
by roopn
I love new preakness, maybe even more than old preaknes... And I fucking LOVE old preakness

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 7:45 am
by Vovenarg
pfork are a buncha pansies, but i guess 8.7 is above the 4 star average this album has going so far so that's good. I really expected a 9.0 from them though, and would give it a bit higher myself.

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 8:58 am
by roopn
any australians got their preorders yet? I haven't, I think mine's still sitting in chicago

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 10:15 am
by Dallou
It got it's ok, no need to be upset. 9 or 8.7 doesn't change a thing, a lot of people are gonna listen to it.

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 12:12 pm
by bansheebeaten
p4k wrote:
In Lennox’s cathedral of sound, you can always see the stormy skies creeping in view through the radiant stained-glass windows.

I like when people use imagery like this for music. this is image.. works for a few parts and I see where he's coming from

edit; damn, that was a really good read. pretty much all praise from what I could see! a very cool viewpoint.

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 12:16 pm
by sertman
Dallou wrote:
It got it's ok, no need to be upset. 9 or 8.7 doesn't change a thing, a lot of people are gonna listen to it.

yup... it's ok = many people listening to panda bear :) no need to trip over the score, i personally think it's pretty fair!

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 12:55 pm
by 'Bros' Owl
I thought higher too but, if you look at Metacritic, it's actually one of the highest scores: http://www.metacritic.com/music/panda-b ... ic-reviews

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 2:37 pm
by jetski
I didn't want to know P4k's numerical rating for fear of it subconsciously affecting my view of the album. Oh well, I guess I should have expected the score to pop up in this thread

I'd say it deserves at least a 9, but for me I think the larger problem is numerical ratings in general, which I don't think are a good method of evaluating music. But I digress...

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 2:58 pm
by P nu
no mention of Brian Wilson in the P4K review!! :)

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 3:09 pm
by onebraineno
P nu wrote:
no mention of Brian Wilson in the P4K review!! :)

Pitchfork
wrote:
A sobering aftershock arrives in the form of late-album wake-up call "Selfish Gene"—a sort-of post-rave "That's Not Me"—where the incessant synth-jabs provide Lennox with needling reminders of his family-man mission ("When it comes to fill those spaces/ Only you can fill those spaces").


Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 3:12 pm
by nevermind
i think pitchfork should lose the point increments. and just use a 10-point scale. simplified. straight to the point and impactful reviews. never a fan of the 100-point scale anyway, which it basically is. it's too fine. used to be so turned off by gaming websites that used it. like, is a 9.0 game really better than an 8.9 game?

anyway, it's quite nice to see favorable reviews. im sure team panda's feeling pretty pumped.

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 3:15 pm
by onebraineno
Maybe they should just get rid of the point system all together, force people to read the reviews and maybe make their own assumptions.

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 3:16 pm
by jetski
onebraineno wrote:
Maybe they should just get rid of the point system all together, force people to read the reviews and maybe make their own assumptions.

Pretty much exactly how I feel.

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 3:21 pm
by awesome
Their review isn't posted yet, but Allmusic has given this 4.5 out of 5 stars:

http://www.allmusic.com/album/panda-bea ... 0002771130


Apparently Shadow of the Colossus is a highlight haha

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 3:21 pm
by awesome
[tindeck][/tindeck]
Hiff Cluxtable wrote:
cledbury wrote:
Don't know if this was posted already or not but it's a q&a from Newsweek
http://www.newsweek.com/qa-panda-bear-m ... eek-298490

I was a bit interviewed out, but this was great.

Didn't want it to get lost in the shuffle.

Man if Geoff Barrow had had a hand in Tomboy... Third (by Portishead, and one of the best albums of the 00s) has a super similar vibe now that I think on it.

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 3:26 pm
by nevermind
stereogum has a different take on their 'interview' with PB. neat read. quite insightful

http://www.stereogum.com/1727414/an-ann ... interview/

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 3:27 pm
by P nu
onebraineno wrote:
P nu wrote:
no mention of Brian Wilson in the P4K review!! :)

Pitchfork
wrote:
A sobering aftershock arrives in the form of late-album wake-up call "Selfish Gene"—a sort-of post-rave "That's Not Me"—where the incessant synth-jabs provide Lennox with needling reminders of his family-man mission ("When it comes to fill those spaces/ Only you can fill those spaces").


wow!! hahahaha

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 3:37 pm
by jetski
nevermind wrote:
stereogum has a different take on their 'interview' with PB. neat read. quite insightful

http://www.stereogum.com/1727414/an-ann ... interview/

Wow, this is really amazing

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 4:03 pm
by faded arrow
Did anybody else get weird creasing on the left part of the collar

Also, sweet Fact mix. Such good selections

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 4:17 pm
by jetski
Yeah this mix rocks

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 4:19 pm
by lucasmoreira
principe real is my favorite song from the atp, i like the album version too but i miss so much the "mine..mine..mine..miiiine!!"

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 4:39 pm
by roopn
That bit is rad

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 4:43 pm
by Lacrimosa
Principe could be my favourite song on PBMTGR, together with LW ofcourse.

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 4:50 pm
by FAF
does anyone else have it set up in their music player where the demo version of cosplay comes on after acid wash? it works so well as a little slightly irreverent "epilogue" to the album, esp with the apocalypse now/drone ending

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 4:56 pm
by tulis
These 24 bit recordings that I got with the DL code from Domino are super revealing. Noah's vocals have never been clearer/cleaner. The production really stands out - really great space and separation between the different instruments and samples, creating really interesting and beautiful soundscapes. Great work, Noah and Pete! Thanks so much for your hard work.

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 4:59 pm
by faded arrow
Tropic of Cancer is the most affecting song he's ever made for sure

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 5:19 pm
by cledbury
Is anyone going to rip the audio or video of the boiler room set?

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 6:06 pm
by elks
Too lazy to go through the last few pages, but did anyone else get bummy paper sleeves? Two out of the three I got were super bent, one partially ripped. Reminds me of my tomboy boxset's sleeves. Oh well

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 6:25 pm
by Dallou
"Then I’m gonna try and shift back over to working on Animal Collective stuff. We’re all writing stuff at the moment, so at some point we’ll reconvene to start putting everything together." That's good news

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 6:33 pm
by StrangeClams
i hope panda brings his octatracks to AC rehearsal sesh

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 6:43 pm
by kafkaesque
Aziza wrote:
The more I think of which track I would most like to hear on Fallon, the more I keep thinking Crosswords would be the surest bet. Then again, who knows which one he'll choose. I expected either Slow Motion or Surfer's Hymn last time around and we got You Can Count On Me instead soooo it's anyone's guess. I'm just really into Crosswords lately.

crosswords and lonely wanderer are the best tracks on the album IMO. crosswords in particular went from being my 6th or 7th favorite on the record to perhaps my #1. awesome song

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 6:48 pm
by dervish
crossroads has really catapulted up for me too. i just can't help but imagine what it would have been like to have a longer intro with the beat drop though.

i honestly think this album is panda's strongest material to date and i feel good about him rolling into AC sessions this hot. it's all gold.

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 6:58 pm
by tulis
acid wash gets better every time i hear it.

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 7:08 pm
by 'Bros' Owl
Spin review: http://www.spin.com/reviews/spin-album- ... im-reaper/

Album of the week, 8/10 :)

Same from MOJO: http://www.mojo4music.com/18437/panda-b ... rim-reaper

And another, largely positive review on skiddle.com: http://www.skiddle.com/news/all/Review- ... per/24282/

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 7:14 pm
by tulis
My opinion of This Side of Paradise has vastly improved after listening to the 24-bit audio recording. WOW.

seriously, like an entirely different song.

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 7:20 pm
by Cussing Bum
Dallou wrote:
It got it's ok, no need to be upset. 9 or 8.7 doesn't change a thing, a lot of people are gonna listen to it.

Yeah, I'm certainly not upset and I'm glad it will get exposure. That's the most important thing.

But I also don't want Noah to think people think this is a B album. This shit is an A.

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 7:20 pm
by Cussing Bum
tulis wrote:
My opinion of This Side of Paradise has vastly improved after listening to the 24-bit audio recording. WOW.

seriously, like an entirely different song.

Headphones or speakers?

Re: Panda Bear Meets the Grim Reaper

Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 7:36 pm
by iKahn
Victor_Borge wrote:
I didn't want to know P4k's numerical rating for fear of it subconsciously affecting my view of the album. Oh well, I guess I should have expected the score to pop up in this thread

I'd say it deserves at least a 9, but for me I think the larger problem is numerical ratings in general, which I don't think are a good method of evaluating music. But I digress...

They aren't rating the album, they're rating their opinion on the album.


The album is as good or as bad and you want it to be, you can assign any number you want it doesn't mean the album is that good. Y'dig?